The Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), accusing the agency of illegally limiting the use of water in dishwashers and clothes washers.
Dan Greenberg, CEI general counsel, accused the regulations of being “lawless” and anti-consumer. “Whether it is good policy to set a water cap that requires appliances to run multiple, wasteful cycles just to get clothes and dishes clean is a question for our elected officials in Congress to debate,” he said.
“The question for the court is whether regulators should be allowed to ignore the text of congressional statutes to achieve their own policy goals.”
Energy efficiency standards have forced manufacturers to make washers that use lower amounts of water and electricity. With less water, rinsing is less efficient, resulting in a longer rinsing process. It’s a similar case with dishwashers.
DOE said the new rules for clothes washers were expected to save Americans up to $39 billion on their energy and water bills. The agency projected a reduction of roughly 71 million metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions, equivalent to the annual emissions of nearly nine million homes.
The dishwasher standards are estimated to save almost $3.2 billion in utility bills over 30 years and achieve cumulative emission reductions of 9.5 million metric tons of carbon dioxide.
Extent of DOE Authority
The complaint revolves around the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975 (EPCA) which aimed to limit energy use of residential appliances to minimize America’s dependence on OPEC oil.Congress amended EPCA through the Energy Policy Act of 1992 to expand the definition of consumer products to specifically include showerheads, faucets, water closets, and urinals.
In the lawsuit, plaintiffs argue the DOE does not have the authority to implement appliance regulations other than for “showerheads, faucets, water closets, and urinals.”
On Jan. 8, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals pointed out that “no part of that text [of EPCA] indicates Congress gave DOE power to regulate water use for energy-using appliances (like dishwashers and washing machines).”
Plaintiffs noted that, as “unlawfully regulated” consumers, they were harmed by the restrictive nature of the rules.
The DOE’s energy efficiency standards have already targeted pool pumps, battery chargers, ceiling fans, dehumidifiers, and gas stoves.
“At the direction of Congress, DOE is continuing to review and finalize energy standards for household appliances, such as residential furnaces, to lower costs for working families by reducing energy use and slashing harmful pollutants in homes across the nation,” Ms. Granholm said last year.
It warned that severe restrictions could end up putting the performance of appliances at risk.
The group noted that efficient washing machines also cut down energy consumption of dryers since the clothes that come out tend to be less wet, giving the dryer less work.
“People agree that we can have clean clothes without needlessly wasting energy and water,” said Johanna Neumann, senior director of the group’s Campaign for 100 Percent Renewable Energy.
“To build the energy system of the future, we need to work smarter, not harder … Making sure appliances such as washers and dryers don’t needlessly waste energy checks that box.”